Product Design & Manufacturing

Dyson Bladeless Fan Reverse Engineering

Design for Assembly Optimization and Manufacturing Analysis

Duration
1.5 months
Team
Tanmay Dharmaji Mhatre,Saravana Kumar Prakash Kodakinti, Sathyanarayanan Srikanthan (Sathya), Anoop Subramanya
Client
Design for Manufacturability Course - CU Boulder

Project Overview

This project applied Design for Assembly (DFA) principles and SolidWorks modeling to reverse engineer and optimize a Dyson bladeless fan design. The project focused on understanding its innovative design, streamlining assembly, and improving manufacturability through targeted material and process selection. The detailed teardown revealed a unique airflow system and provided a foundation for design optimization and cost reduction analysis.

The Challenge

The primary challenge was to reverse engineer a complex consumer product to understand its design principles and then optimize it for improved manufacturability. The Dyson fan initially consisted of 48 total parts (38 unique), presenting a significant opportunity for design simplification. The goal was to reduce the part count and improve assembly efficiency while maintaining the product's core functionality, signature bladeless design, and aesthetic appeal.

Our Solution

A detailed reverse engineering process was conducted, beginning with a complete teardown and measurement of all components, which were then modeled in SolidWorks. A comprehensive DFA analysis was performed to identify inefficiencies and guide part reduction strategies. Four fundamental design changes were proposed: eliminating three wire holders, removing one of the three swivel base supports, removing the sensor hatch by attaching the sensor directly to the base, and integrating the LCD/PCB holder into the swivel base plate. Ashby charts and decision matrices were used to validate the existing material selections—primarily PC/ABS, POM, and stainless steel—ensuring an optimal balance of strength, cost, and manufacturability. Manufacturing processes like injection molding, forging, and wire drawing were analyzed and confirmed as the most efficient methods for high-volume production.

Dyson Gallery

Dyson Bladeless Fan Reverse Engineering - Image 1
Auto
1 / 5

Design Changes

Interactive Model

Interactive Assembly
eDrawings Viewer

Exploded assembly view showing component relationships

Key Results

0
Part Count Reduction
reduced from 48 to 40 parts through design optimization
0
DFA Score Improvement
improved from 75.26 to 64.8 using systematic DFA methodology
0
Cost Effectiveness
reduced total variable cost from $96 to $83 and improved break-even point from 204 to 228 units
0
Design Optimization
through part consolidation and integration of wire holders and sensor mounts into main housings

Technologies & Tools

SolidWorks
Design for Assembly (DFA)
Ashby Charts
Decision Matrices
Material Selection
Economic & Break-Even Analysis

Project Timeline

1
3 weeks

Disassembly & CAD Modeling

Complete teardown of the Dyson fan, followed by measurement and detailed modeling of all components in SolidWorks

Deliverables:
  • Complete initial CAD model
  • Technical drawings
  • Preliminary Bill of Materials
2
2 weeks

DFA, Material & Economic Analysis

Conducted in-depth analyses to identify optimization opportunities including DFA, material choices using Ashby charts, and economic analysis

Deliverables:
  • Initial DFA analysis report
  • Material selection matrices using Ashby charts
  • Complete economic and break-even analysis
3
2 weeks

Redesign & Finalization

Based on the analysis, design changes were implemented to reduce part count and simplify assembly

Deliverables:
  • Redesigned CAD model
  • New DFA analysis showing 13.9% score improvement
  • Updated economic report reflecting cost savings

Technical Specifications

Final Part Count40 parts
Primary MaterialPC/ABS
Secondary MaterialStainless Steel
Tertiary MaterialPOM
Manufacturing ProcessInjection Molding, Forging, and Wire Drawing
DFA Score64.8 (Optimized for assembly)
Initial Part Count48 parts
Initial DFA Score75.26
Cost ReductionFrom $96 to $83 variable cost
Break-Even ImprovementFrom 204 to 228 units

Key Features

Streamlined design through DFA principles, reducing assembly complexity
Optimized material selection balancing cost, performance, and durability
Part consolidation by integrating wire holders and sensor mounts into main housings
Manufacturing process alignment for high-volume scalability and precision
High-volume production capability ensured through processes like injection molding
Simplified base assembly for reduced assembly time and potential for error
13.9% improvement in DFA score from 75.26 to 64.8
17% reduction in part count from 48 to 40 components

Team

SKP

Saravana Kumar Prakash

AS

Anoop Subramanya

SS

Sathyanarayanan S

Interested in Similar Work?

Let's discuss how we can bring innovative engineering solutions to your next project.